Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center
Añadido: 01/06/2007
http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/news/news_wtc.cfm
Researchers at Purdue University have created a simulation that uses scientific principles to study in detail what likely happened when a commercial airliner crashed into the World Trade Center's North Tow...
Autor: PurdueRCAC
Reproduciones 7797885
Duración: 5
Calificación: 4.18384










@jizzmonger You support hiding the guilt of the people responible for the murder of the WTC victims. Google 9/11 Press for truth (and watch it) and if you still deny there was a cover up you are just as guilty. As for molten metal in the basements of WTC buildings then you are also a liar. Or the rescue workers are...which is it ?
@Bi0hazardx "Neither fires nor a collapse could create molten steel" I agree which is why one wonders why you keep claiming there was molten steel when you have no evidence of it. Not even a photo or a gob of it being scooped out during the clean up. I think you do better as a UFO hoaxing video maker than an anti-us, british propaganda agent Rizla. What do you think?
@Bi0hazardx "There is no way they can telescope into themselves downwards" That's probably why they stayed standing while the floors and outer walls collapsed. Rizla.
Most people died before the plane hitted the tower. The air pressure must have been to much.
This was incredible. The plane fuselage was shown sailing through the building virtually intact!!! Office buildings are filled with tons of stuff: desks papers, interior walls, safes, etc. Do they expect me to believe that an aluminum airplane that wiggles when it flies in air is going to bash its way into the middle of an office building intact??? Steel trucks that hit the side of a building get thoroughly mangled.
@ctrackmonger Structural steel remains constant. When one refers to a temperature exposure of steel, they are refering to the temp that the micro-structures react at a given temp.
@wowthatsalowpric Thanks for showing how ignorant you are on the subject. No building hit WTC7 which collapsed at free-fall acceleration rate.... And you said it couldn't support the building, hinting at the pancake collapse theory that was put forward in 2002, and discredited by even FEMA and NIST a year later. There were 47 large self contained vertical columns in WTC 1 and 2. There is no way they can telescope into themselves downwards. Only the floors would have displaced straight down.
@wowthatsalowpric Well 600 degrees C is 530 degrees C of the SOLIDUS of STRUCTURAL STEEL, so how is it softening it when it is 500 degrees short?
@llsteve1976 the jet fuel doesnt have to burn it to a nub it just had to soften it so it coudnt support the building
@Swordofgnosis I used to use one of those, but ours was a pot belly oven, worked great for warming up ramen noodles in the field, but as you said it never melted!!!
@WarCrime911 I have heard of it, but I haven't read the blog... Send me a link...
Respond to this video... kerosene isnt the hottest burning fuel is it? i remembe rmy old kero heater, wasnt very hot, you'd just about have to put your hads on the flame to keep warm, amazing that some think that kero could melt a steel concrete building.Just shows the dumbing down effort made by the establishment.
@WarCrime911 you will find Webster tarply established all this in his book '911 synthetic terror made in the USA' How else did NORAD get shut down that day?
@ctrackmonger, Have you seen the latest article Kevin Ryan wrote for 911 Blogger? He basically connects the CIA, Carlyle Group, a string of Bush run and other CIA front companies, WTC Security, etc. etc. It really links up names and relations of all the key people who were closest to the crime scene. It's amazing research. Kevin Ryan is a true American Hero.
Again, JizzMonger replied with some rant that had nothing to do with my post. It's sad he doesn't have the social skills of a 10 year old. You know, the ability to have a conversation with someone ELSE not just talking to themselves using TEXT on a computer, 24/7 with no life. Seriously, you aren't even smart enough to respond to a question or discuss things in context. I'm glad your around, you make 911 Debunkers look bad everywhere. Really helps to have someone as immature as you around.
* Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel and Explosives. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU Neither fires nor a collapse could create molten steel. Even NIST admitted that the temperatures needed to create molten metal and merge steel together - could not have happened due to the official explanation of the collapse Debunkers skip what they cannot explain: A straight forward video of NIST discussing this, and the irrefutable evidence of Molten Steel. I hope you actually check into both sides of the debate
@llsteve1976 The 9/11 Commission NOW reveals that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The sources and details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission. Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.
They're trying to say that a flying aluminum tube sheered all the reinforced steel core columns. After that, the jet fueld drained directly into the core and magically melted the steel columns to a nub, though jet fuel isn't hot enough to melt it.
@jizzmonger "I am 12 years old. Why do you want to kill children?" Oh and aren't you the one who said, that it is okay for us to kill the people in Iraq and Afghanistan, that they were not humans because they stone girls to death, yet it is okay for us to do that through barrels and bombs?
@jizzmonger "Osama bin Laden. The financial interests of the bin Laden family are represented by the Saudi Binladin Group, a global construction and equity management conglomerate grossing $5 billion U.S. dollars annually, and one of the largest construction firms in the Islamic world"
What, you are saying people who refuse to look at evidence, before discussing the evidence they never saw - is not an educated response? Jizz Monger doesn't need to bother himself with nonsense things like evidence, or the basis of what is being discussed. He was born a psychic, who could guess his way through every question and know he was always right without having to check up on it's accuracy. Really one of the most disgusting human personality traits someone could have. And he has no life.
@jizzmonger "The bin Laden family (Arabic: بن لادن), also spelled bin Ladin, is a wealthy family intimately connected with the innermost circles of the Saudi royal family. The family was thrown into media spotlight through the activities of one of its members," Cont.
@jizzmonger "I am 12 years old. Why do you want to kill children?" If you are 12 years old, why are you trying to discuss something that happened when you were in diapers?
@jizzmonger Jizz, you have responded to a technical discussion, problem is your answers never went with that technical discussion!!! All you did was rant your opinion, nothing technical about that!!!
You think jizzmonger is actually EVER going to show Integrity?? It's laughable. His only scientific method is the "Psychic Approach". He refuses to look at any evidence or sources, especially when he asks you for them. And then instead of looking at them, he imagines what he would assume would be in the evidence he has never seen, and thus has no contextual understanding of. So instead of dealing with data, he just "assumes" and then replies as if he did check sources. Pathetic!